Gastroenterol Res
Gastroenterology Research, ISSN 1918-2805 print, 1918-2813 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Gastroenterol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.gastrores.org

Original Article

Volume 000, Number 000, July 2024, pages 000-000


Clinical Efficacy of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Percutaneous Microwave Coagulation Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hu Hu Rena, Zhi Qun Wua, Jian Chena, Chen Lib, c

aDepartment of Intervention, Fourth Military Medical University Affiliated Tangdu Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi 7100322, China
bInterventional Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Red Cross Hospital of Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China
cCorresponding Author: Chen Li, Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment Center, Red Cross Hospital of Xi’an, Shaanxi 710061, China

Manuscript submitted March 13, 2024, accepted June 4, 2024, published online July 18, 2024
Short title: TACE Combined With PMCT for Advanced HCC
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1713

Abstract▴Top 

Background: The aim of the study was to explore the clinical efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: Eighty-three advanced HCC patients were divided into the experimental group (TACE + PMCT, 57 cases) and the control group (TACE alone, 26 cases). They received TACE treatment first, and computed tomography (CT) or hepatic artery angiography was performed 3 - 4 weeks after each treatment. Based on the comprehensive evaluation of iodine oil deficiency, fistula recanalization, residual lesions, and lesion progression, TACE or PMCT treatment was selectively performed, and three consecutive treatments were considered as one treatment cycle.

Results: The experimental group had a response rate (RR) of 49.1%, and the control group had a RR of 38.4%. The reduction rate of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in the experimental group was significantly higher than the control group (P < 0.05). The cumulative survival rates in the experimental at 1-, 1.5-, and 2-year post-treatment were higher than the control group. The cumulative recurrence and metastasis rates in the experimental at 1.5-, and 2-year post-treatment were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, there were no significant differences in treatment-related complications in the two groups.

Conclusions: The combined treatment of TACE and PMCT for advanced HCC is a safe, feasible, and effective treatment method, prolonging the survival time, and reducing the recurrence and metastasis rate, without increased toxic and side effects.

Keywords: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma; Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; Percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy; Hepatic artery-portal vein fistula; Clinical efficacy

Introduction▴Top 

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer with increased incidence and mortality worldwide [1]. The primary treatment currently available in clinical practice for HCC is surgical resection. However, only 15-30% of patients meet the surgical criteria due to the difficulty in early diagnosis [2]. Chinese clinical guidelines recommend interventional therapy, which provides nearly 30 months of survival benefit for patients with middle-to-advanced HCC [3-5]. Meanwhile, guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European Association for the Study of Liver Disease (EASL) suggest non-surgical therapies such as interventional therapy and systemic therapy for conversion therapy before surgical resection [6]. The development of translational therapy has been carried out on various solid tumors, such as gastric cancer, rectal cancer, and HCC, and is continuously expanding [7]. The ultimate goal of this approach is to transform unresectable tumors into resectable tumors [8-10]. Currently, there are a variety of treatment modalities that have been proposed for HCC [11].

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) is now the preferred treatment for inoperable mid-to-advanced stage HCC, owing to its minimal invasiveness, straightforward procedure, high safety, strong repeatability, and dependable short-term effectiveness [12]. This method offers the combined benefits of tumor perfusion chemotherapy and tumor vascular embolization therapy. It not only enhances the concentration of chemotherapy in the tumor region but also minimizes systemic toxicity and side effects [13]. By embolizing tumor blood vessels, this approach not only cuts down on the tumor’s blood supply, but also the embolic agent lipiodol (LP) acts as a carrier for chemotherapy drugs. This reduces the dilution and washout of the drugs by blood flow [14]. The gradual release of drugs from the treatment ensures a prolonged impact on HCC lesions. Nevertheless, post-TACE treatment, only about 20% to 50% of the tumor tissue becomes completely necrotic. Even with repeated treatments, residual cancer often persists, leading to a 5-year survival rate of 9% to 16.2% [15]. Moreover, a significant number of HCC patients present with arterial and venous fistulas, advanced liver cirrhosis, and portal hypertension, along with multiple arterial blood supplies. Embolizing these arteries can lead to severe complications, resulting in the discontinuation of embolization therapy, which in turn impacts its clinical effectiveness [16].

Recent studies have increasingly emphasized the importance of comprehensive approaches in treating HCC [17]. Percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT) has emerged as a crucial element in the comprehensive treatment of HCC, due to its minimal invasiveness, straightforward procedure, high precision, and strong repeatability [18]. Presently, numerous studies have focused on the use of PMCT alone, or in combination with TACE, for treating HCC lesions smaller than 5 - 10 cm in diameter. However, there are few studies on the application of TACE combined with PMCT for treating middle and advanced-stage HCC with larger lesions [19]. In this study, we aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and application value of TACE combined with PMCT for advanced HCC.

Materials and Methods▴Top 

Subjects

This is a retrospective observational study approved by the Ethics Committee of the Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University. All patients have signed an informed consent form. From February 2019 to September 2022, a total of 125 patients with locally advanced HCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) T3/T4) underwent TACE combined with PMCT (experimental group) or TACE alone (control group) in the Interventional Department of the Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University. The study data were selected based on a comprehensive review of medical records from patients who underwent treatment at our hospital. The assignment of patients to either the experimental group or the control group was based on clinical judgments and patient preferences. Among them, 83 patients with complete eligible data were observed and analyzed. In this study, 57 patients who underwent combined treatment of TACE and PMCT were designated as the experimental group, while 26 patients who received only TACE treatment were selected as the control group. Diagnostic criteria included: 1) All cases were diagnosed as HCC through imaging examinations such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and B-ultrasound, combined with alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) values and clinical manifestations; 2) Some cases were confirmed by liver biopsy pathology; 3) The staging was determined accordingly to the AJCC Version 9 Cancer Staging System. Inclusion criteria were: 1) Middle- to late-stage HCC patients with complete clinical records; 2) Patients voluntarily accept the above treatment and sign a consent form; 3) Patients with Child-Pugh grading of liver function as A or B; 4) There were no contraindications to TACE or PMCT in all biochemical indicators; 5) Karnofsky score ≥ 60. Exclusion criteria were: 1) Patients diagnosed with diffuse HCC; 2) Patients with severe heart, lung, and kidney dysfunction and systemic cachexia; 3) The number of HCC lesions is greater than 4 or the diameter of HCC lesions is greater than 15 cm.

This study was conducted in compliance with the ethical standards of the responsible institution on human subjects as well as with the Helsinki Declaration.

Preoperative preparation

All enrolled patients were undergoing their first TACE surgery. The protocol included an iodine allergy test conducted a day before the surgery, preparation of bilateral inguinal skin, and a requirement for fasting 6 h before the surgery. PMCT was conducted 2 - 3 days after TACE. For the PMCT surgery, patients were instructed to fast for 3 - 4 h beforehand, and they received an intramuscular injection of 75 mg of dipyridamole and 10 mg of diazepam 5 min before the procedure. Dosages were adjusted for elderly patients or those in poorer physical condition as necessary. Additionally, patients in both groups signed various consent forms before undergoing the surgery.

TACE

The Seldinger technique was utilized for percutaneous femoral artery catheterization, involving the placement of a 5F arterial catheter sheath and catheter. Routine angiography of the celiac artery and superior mesenteric artery was conducted to assess the location, number, size, vascular variation, and tumor blood supply of the HCC, including the artery shape, presence of portal vein tumor thrombus, and arterioportal fistula. Appropriate catheters were selected for super-selective access to the hepatic artery and tumor-supplying vessels. In cases with challenging or small tumor-supplying arteries, 3F microcatheters were used. The tumor-supplying artery was then infused with 750 - 1,000 mg of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 40 - 60 mg of epirubicin (EPI) or cisplatin (DDP). The tumor-supplying artery was embolized using a mix of 10 - 14 mg of mitomycin C (MMC) and 10 - 30 mL of LP, with additional embolization using gelatin sponge particles as needed. In HCC patients with hepatic arterioportal fistula, small fistulae with low shunt flow were initially embolized using gelatin sponge particles. After re-examination and angiography confirming the disappearance of the fistula, embolization treatment was administered. In cases of large fistulae with high shunt flow, if the fistula could be avoided, super-selective embolization of the tumor liver or sub-liver segment was performed, with careful monitoring for reflux during the procedure. If reflux occurred, embolization was immediately stopped, and large gelatin sponge particles, strips, or spring coils were used to embolize the fistulae and tumor-supplying arteries directly. Post-surgery, the catheter was removed, bleeding was controlled by compression, and a local pressure bandage was applied for 12 - 24 h.

PMCT

The selection of the patient’s body position was dependent on the lesion’s location. For right liver lesions, the intercostal space was typically chosen as the puncture point, with the patient lying on their left side. Conversely, for left liver lesions, a subcostal puncture point was selected, and the patient was positioned supine. After pinpointing the lesion with ultrasound, routine disinfection and tissue placement were carried out. Local anesthesia was then administered via the needle channel using 5 - 10 mL of 2% lidocaine. Under ultrasound guidance, the puncture needle was inserted through the liver into the active area of the tumor, replaced with a microwave antenna, and connected to a microwave treatment device. The initial output power was controlled between 40 - 80 W for 15 - 20 min, depending on the lesion size, the required range of thermocoagulation, and the patient’s tolerance. Multi-point, multi-knife simultaneous, or staged treatment approaches were employed in cases where the residual tumor was larger (diameter > 5 cm). Post-surgery, the needle was withdrawn, the puncture site was disinfected, and a pressure bandage was applied. The postoperative care included hemostasis, liver protection, anti-inflammatory treatment, and general symptomatic support.

Observation and follow-up indicators

Laboratory examination

Before routine surgery and on the 3-, 7-, and 14-day post-surgery, fasting peripheral blood was collected for blood routine, liver and kidney function enzymology, and AFP quantification. Typically, the lab tests were performed monthly for the first 6 months following treatment, and every 3 months thereafter.

Imaging examination

Routine preoperative and postoperative liver contrast-enhanced CT examinations were performed every 3 - 4 weeks. After the treatment period, contrast-enhanced CT examinations were performed every 3 months and then every 6 months after 1 year. CT physicians who are proficient in MSCT measurement software compared and measured the changes in tumor size before and after treatment.

Efficacy evaluation

The treatment efficacy is evaluated based on the World Health Organization (WHO) solid tumor measurement guidelines. After treatment, a contrast-enhanced CT scan of the liver confirmed the presence of new lesions in the liver tissue connected to the lesion, indicating local tumor progression (LTP); other new lesions within or outside the liver are distant recurrence (DR). The mid-term and long-term efficacy are evaluated based on the survival rate, calculated from the date of TACE treatment for the patient.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed with GraphPad 9.0 Software. Data were reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The differences between the two groups were analyzed using Student’s t-test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results▴Top 

Baseline characteristics of participants

In our study, we compared the clinical characteristics of patients with advanced HCC who were divided into a control group (n = 26) and an experiment group (n = 57) to evaluate the efficacy of TACE combined with PMCT. The demographic and clinical parameters assessed included gender distribution, tumor diameter, AFP level, Child-Pugh score, clinical stages, presence of portal vein tumor thrombus, and merge HCC with arterioportal shunts (hepatic arterio-portal shunts (HAPS)). Gender distribution showed no significant difference between the two groups (Table 1).

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Clinical Characteristics
 

Efficacy outcomes of therapeutic intervention

We next evaluated the clinical efficacy of the different treatments for advanced HCC. In the experiment group, there were 11 cases of complete response and 17 cases of partial response, compared to three cases of complete response and seven cases of partial response in the control group. The number of patients with stable disease was also higher in the experiment group compared to the control group. The objective response rate, which includes patients who achieved a complete or partial response, was higher in the experiment group (49.1%) compared to the control group (38.4%). Similarly, the disease control rate, encompassing patients with complete response, partial response, and stable disease, was greater in the experiment group (82.4%) than in the control group (69.2%) (Table 2).

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Analysis of Clinical Efficacy
 

Changes in AFP levels after treatment

After the intervention, the distribution of AFP levels across different thresholds showed significant variation between the two groups (P = 0.045). In the experiment group, there was a notable increase in the number of patients achieving an AFP level of ≤ 20 ng/mL, rising to 19 from 4 in the control group. The patients with AFP levels ranging from 20 to 400 ng/mL were 21 in the experiment group compared to 7 in the control group (Table 3).

Table 3.
Click to view
Table 3. Quantitative Analysis of AFP After Treatment
 

Survival analysis over 2 years

At 0.5 years after treatment, 69.2% of the control group and 80.7% of the experiment group were still alive, and at the 1-year interval, with 61.3% survival in the control group compared to 75.4% in the experiment group. The survival advantage for the experiment group was further evident at 1.5 years (50.0% vs. 66.7%) and maintained at 2 years (30.8% vs. 52.6%) (Table 4).

Table 4.
Click to view
Table 4. Analysis of Survival Time
 

Recurrence and metastasis rates following treatment

At the 0.5-year mark, the recurrence and metastasis rate was slightly lower in the experiment group (8.8%) compared to the control group (15.4%). By the 1-year interval, the control group had a recurrence and metastasis rate of 34.6%, while the experiment group’s rate was significantly lower at 21.1%. This trend continued at the 1.5-year post-treatment (50.0% vs. 29.8%). The disparity between the groups further widened by the 2-year interval (69.2% vs. 36.8%, P = 0.008) (Table 5).

Table 5.
Click to view
Table 5. Analysis of Cumulative Recurrence and Metastasis Rates
 

Treatment-related complications

The occurrence of treatment-related complications including fever, pain, nausea and vomiting, transaminase levels, and jaundice were not different. These findings indicate that the addition of PMCT to TACE does not significantly increase the risk of complications (Table 6).

Table 6.
Click to view
Table 6. The Occurrence of Complications
 
Discussion▴Top 

The liver is the sixth most common site of human primary cancer, which usually occurs in the context of cirrhosis and inflammation [20]. HCC has become one of the three most lethal tumors in China [21]. Patients with HCC in the early stage often have no obvious clinical symptoms, and the disease has progressed to the middle and late stage when it is found, thus missing the best opportunity for surgery, resulting in a low resection rate of surgical lesions [22]. In addition, most patients with HCC are complicated with severe cirrhosis, so patients often find it difficult to accept intervention and various ablation operations, and treatment methods are relatively scarce [23]. In this study, the experimental group showed superior efficacy over the control group.

Primary HCC is one of the most common malignant tumors in Asia and China. HCC in China accounts for about 40-50% of the global HCC, and the incidence is second only to lung cancer and gastric cancer, ranking third. The mortality rate of the malignant tumor was second [24]. HCC has the characteristics of high malignancy, rapid progression, and poor prognosis. The average survival time of untreated patients with HCC is 2 - 6 months. Although surgical resection is the best way to cure HCC, only 10-15% of patients with HCC have the chance of operation when they are found, and the recurrence rate is as high as 40-60% in 5 years after the operation [25]. Moreover, in patients who can be operated on, because of the multicentric origin of the tumor and the tumor adjacent to the large blood vessels and bile ducts in the liver, combined with severe liver cirrhosis and liver dysfunction, the surgical method and effect of radical resection will be affected [25]. We found that after one cycle of treatment, the AFP levels were significantly decreased, and the average rate of AFP quantification decrease after treatment in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group.

Primary HCC has a high degree of malignancy, and occult onset, and is mostly in the middle and late stages at the first diagnosis [26]. The average survival time of untreated HCC patients was 2 - 6 months, and only a small proportion of HCC patients could be resected surgically [27]. The recurrence rate of large HCC in 5 years after operation was as high as 40-60%. Moreover, resection of large HCC will lead to low immune function, which will promote the rapid growth of residual cancer [28]. TACE is the most commonly used diagnostic and therapeutic technique for unresectable advanced HCC. The short-term curative effect of simple treatment is good, but the long-term curative effect is not ideal [29]. The complete ablation and survival rates of large HCC treated with PMCT alone decreased [30]. The complete ablation rate of PMCT for HCC with diameter < 3 cm and > 5 cm was 98% and 59%, and the 5-year cumulative survival rate was 60% and 25%, respectively [31]. The reason is that for large tumors with rich blood supply, tumor blood vessels, as a huge cooling pool, are easy to take away heat and affect the temperature rise, so ablation is not complete [31]. In addition, for lesions near the hepatic hilum, large blood vessels, and bile ducts, PMCT treatment is prone to damage blood vessels, bile duct bleeding or bile fistula, gallbladder perforation, and bile peritonitis, so some special parts are also limited [32]. Our study showed that the cumulative survival rates of the experimental group within a 2-year follow-up showed an increased survival rate than the control group, indicating the effectiveness of the combination therapy in treating advanced HCC than TACE alone.

In recent years, scholars at home and abroad have emphasized the importance of comprehensive treatment of HCC [33]. PMCT has become an important part of the comprehensive treatment of HCC due to its advantages of mild trauma, simple operation, high accuracy, and good repeatability [34]. At present, the main research at home and abroad is the application of PMCT alone or TACE + PMCT in the treatment of early HCC less than 5.0 cm, while the research on TACE combined with PMCT in the treatment of advanced HCC with large lesions is less [35]. In this study, after treatment, fever, pain, nausea, vomiting, elevated transaminase, jaundice, and other symptoms occurred in both groups to varying degrees, which were alleviated after liver protection, jaundice, and symptomatic treatment, without other serious complications.

In recent years, technological developments in the medical field have been rapid and continuously evolving. Particularly transformative is the introduction of the Internet of Things (IoT) within medical practice, revolutionizing how healthcare providers monitor and manage illnesses. A notable example is the “Internet of Medical Things” (IoMT), a connected infrastructure of medical devices, software applications, and health systems and services. IoMT enhances patient monitoring, treatment personalization, and clinical management [36, 37].

In advanced HCC treatment, IoT plays a significant role. Integrating IoT technologies allows real-time data collection from medical devices like imaging systems and liver function monitors. The data provide continuous updates on patient status, enabling timely adjustments in treatment plans. IoT devices can monitor the efficacy of therapies like TACE and PMCT in real-time, alerting healthcare teams to necessary interventions. IoMT also facilitates remote monitoring and management, reducing hospital visits, especially beneficial for advanced HCC patients with significant physical debilitation [38].

The Internet of Surgical Things (IoST) represents another advancement where connected surgical instruments and devices enhance precision and outcomes. IoST enables real-time data analysis, remote monitoring, and improved communication between surgical devices [39]. Integrating IoT solutions in treatment modalities like TACE and PMCT could further enhance clinical outcomes and patient quality of life by making healthcare delivery more precise, personalized, and responsive.

Conclusions

In conclusion, TACE combined with PMCT is a safe, feasible, and effective treatment for advanced HCC. Reasonable control of the indications of the combined treatment of HCC can improve clinical efficacy and prolong the survival time of patients.

Acknowledgments

None to declare.

Financial Disclosure

None to declare.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Author Contributions

Guarantor of integrity of the entire study: CL. Study concepts: CL and HHR. Study design: CL. Definition of intellectual content: CL. Literature research: ZQW and HHR. Clinical studies: HHR. Experimental studies: HHR, JC. Data acquisition: ZQW and HHR. Data analysis: HHR, ZQW, and JC. Manuscript preparation: ZQW and HHR, and JC. Manuscript editing: ZQW and CL. Manuscript review: CL.

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


References▴Top 
  1. Wang J, Chen Y, Luo Z, Huang Q, Zhang Y, Ning H, Liu S, et al. Citri Reticulatae Pericarpium-Reynoutria japonica Houtt. herb pair suppresses breast cancer liver metastasis by targeting ECM1-mediated cholesterol biosynthesis pathway. Phytomedicine. 2023;116:154896.
    doi pubmed
  2. Yang Y, Zhao W, Du J, Wang Y. Prognostic impact of MICALL1 and associates with immune infiltration in liver hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Cancer Biomark. 2023;37(3):147-160.
    doi pubmed
  3. Chowdhury MMH, Salazar CJJ, Nurunnabi M. Recent advances in bionanomaterials for liver cancer diagnosis and treatment. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(14):4821-4842.
    doi pubmed
  4. Gao S, Gang J, Yu M, Xin G, Tan H. Computational analysis for identification of early diagnostic biomarkers and prognostic biomarkers of liver cancer based on GEO and TCGA databases and studies on pathways and biological functions affecting the survival time of liver cancer. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):791.
    doi pubmed pmc
  5. Trinh VQ, Lee TF, Lemoinne S, Ray KC, Ybanez MD, Tsuchida T, Carter JK, et al. Hepatic stellate cells maintain liver homeostasis through paracrine neurotrophin-3 signaling that induces hepatocyte proliferation. Sci Signal. 2023;16(787):eadf6696.
    doi pubmed pmc
  6. Tang Y, Cao J, Peng R, Mao X, Su B, Tang H, Tu D, et al. Screening and verification of key ubiquitination genes related to immune infiltration in stage III/IV hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2023;10:765-781.
    doi pubmed pmc
  7. Slabber CF, Bachofner M, Speicher T, Kuklin A, Fearon AE, Padrissa-Altes S, Bogorad R, et al. The ubiquitin ligase Uhrf2 is a master regulator of cholesterol biosynthesis and is essential for liver regeneration. Sci Signal. 2023;16(787):eade8029.
    doi pubmed
  8. Kastle S, Stechele MR, Richter L, Schinner R, Ocal E, Alunni-Fabbroni M, De Toni E, et al. Peripheral blood-based cell signature indicates response to interstitial brachytherapy in primary liver cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023;149(12):9777-9786.
    doi pubmed pmc
  9. Chen D, Yang F, Wang XJ, Zhao J. Clinical efficacy of comprehensive rehabilitation intervention and its effect on Quality of Life in patients with Advanced Liver Cancer after Ultrasound-guided Microwave Ablation. Pak J Med Sci. 2023;39(3):809-814.
    doi pubmed pmc
  10. Du Y, Rochling FA, Su D, Ratnapradipa KL, Dong J, Farazi PA. Development and Validation of a Questionnaire to Assess Awareness and Knowledge of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, a Liver Cancer Etiological Factor, among Chinese Young Adults. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023;24(5):1543-1551.
    doi pubmed pmc
  11. Ahmadian M, Hosseini S, Alipour A, Jahanfar M, Farrokhi N, Homaeigohar S, Shahsavarani H. In vitro modeling of hepatocellular carcinoma niche on decellularized tomato thorny leaves: a novel natural three-dimensional (3D) scaffold for liver cancer therapeutics. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1189726.
    doi pubmed pmc
  12. Basha S, Jin-Smith B, Sun C, Pi L. The SLIT/ROBO pathway in liver fibrosis and cancer. Biomolecules. 2023;13(5):785.
    doi pubmed pmc
  13. Chu PY, Chou DA, Chen PM, Chiang EI. Translocation of Methionine Adenosyl Transferase MAT2A and Its Prognostic Relevance for Liver Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(10):9103.
    doi pubmed pmc
  14. Amjad W, Verduzco E. Association of Elevated Liver Enzymes With Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Cancer in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024;22(1):204-205.
    doi pubmed
  15. G S, Appadurai JP, Kavin BP, C K, Lai WC. En-denet based segmentation and gradational modular network classification for liver cancer diagnosis. Biomedicines. 2023;11(5):1309.
    doi pubmed pmc
  16. Ainora ME, Cerrito L, Liguori A, Mignini I, De Luca A, Galasso L, Garcovich M, et al. Multiparametric dynamic ultrasound approach for differential diagnosis of primary Liver Tumors. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(10):8548.
    doi pubmed pmc
  17. Wei Y, Dai F, Zhao T, Tao C, Wang L, Ye W, Zhao W. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization monotherapy vs combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization-percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for massive hepatocellular carcinoma (>/=10 cm). Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:5273-5282.
    doi pubmed pmc
  18. Xu LF, Sun HL, Chen YT, Ni JY, Chen D, Luo JH, Zhou JX, et al. Large primary hepatocellular carcinoma: transarterial chemoembolization monotherapy versus combined transarterial chemoembolization-percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28(3):456-463.
    doi pubmed
  19. Das M. TACE plus external beam radiotherapy in liver cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(5):e231.
    doi pubmed
  20. Li Q, Li J, Wang K, Liao L, Li Y, Liang H, Huang C, et al. Activation of sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 3 in liver regeneration impedes the progression of colorectal cancer liver metastasis via exosome-bound intercellular transfer of ceramides. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023;16(3):385-410.
    doi pubmed pmc
  21. Sadaqat M, Qasim M, Tahir Ul Qamar M, Masoud MS, Ashfaq UA, Noor F, Fatima K, et al. Advanced network pharmacology study reveals multi-pathway and multi-gene regulatory molecular mechanism of Bacopa monnieri in liver cancer based on data mining, molecular modeling, and microarray data analysis. Comput Biol Med. 2023;161:107059.
    doi pubmed
  22. Marvin DL, Dijkstra J, Zulfiqar RM, Vermeulen M, Ten Dijke P, Ritsma L. TGF-beta type i receptor signaling in melanoma liver metastases increases metastatic outgrowth. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(10):8676.
    doi pubmed pmc
  23. Kim TW. Fisetin, an Anti-Inflammatory Agent, Overcomes Radioresistance by Activating the PERK-ATF4-CHOP Axis in Liver Cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(10):9076.
    doi pubmed pmc
  24. Yamada K, Hannya Y, Oikawa T, Yoshida A, Katagiri K, Yoshida S, Koizumi R, et al. Extended-synaptotagmin 1 enhances liver cancer progression mediated by the unconventional secretion of cytosolic proteins. Molecules. 2023;28(10):4033.
    doi pubmed pmc
  25. Tendean M, Mambu TDB, Tjandra F, Panelewen J. Systematic extended right posterior sectionectomy (SERPS), a single center serial cases for secondary liver tumors. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023;85(5):2221-2227.
    doi pubmed pmc
  26. Anwanwan D, Singh SK, Singh S, Saikam V, Singh R. Challenges in liver cancer and possible treatment approaches. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2020;1873(1):188314.
    doi pubmed pmc
  27. Cheng K, Cai N, Zhu J, Yang X, Liang H, Zhang W. Tumor-associated macrophages in HCC: From mechanisms to therapy. Cancer Commun (Lond). 2022;42:1112-1140.
  28. Chen JG, Zhang SW. HCC epidemic in China: past, present and future. Semin Cancer Biol. 2011;21:59-69.
  29. Bruix J, Han KH, Gores G, Llovet JM, Mazzaferro V. HCC: Approaching a personalized care. J Hepatol. 2015;62:S144-156.
  30. Kim D, Lee JH, Moon H, Seo M, Han H, Yoo H, Seo H, et al. Development and evaluation of an ultrasound-triggered microbubble combined transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) formulation on rabbit VX2 liver cancer model. Theranostics. 2021;11(1):79-92.
    doi pubmed pmc
  31. Luo Y, Jiang Y. Comparison of Efficiency of TACE plus HIFU and TACE alone on patients with primary liver cancer. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019;29(5):414-417.
    doi pubmed
  32. Han K, Kim JH. Transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment: Barcelona clinic liver cancer staging system. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(36):10327-10335.
    doi pubmed pmc
  33. Sun H, Ni J, Jiang X, Chen D, Chen Y, Xu L. The effect of lipiodol deposition in HCC after TACE on the necrosis range of PMCT. Onco Targets Ther. 2017;10:3835-3842.
    doi pubmed pmc
  34. Wei Y, Dai F, Yi Y, Ye W, Zhao W. Impact of local tumor lesion treatments and preoperative indicators on the survival of patients with small hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncol Lett. 2018;16(4):5050-5058.
    doi pubmed pmc
  35. Ge Y, Jeong S, Luo GJ, Ren YB, Zhang BH, Zhang YJ, Shen F, et al. Transarterial chemoembolization versus percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for recurrent unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Development of a prognostic nomogram. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2020;19(2):138-146.
    doi pubmed
  36. Abdulmalek S, Nasir A, Jabbar WA, Almuhaya MAM, Bairagi AK, Khan MA, Kee SH. IoT-based healthcare-monitoring system towards improving quality of life: a review. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(10):1993.
    doi pubmed pmc
  37. Mulita F, Verras GI, Anagnostopoulos CN, Kotis K. A Smarter Health through the Internet of Surgical Things. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(12):4577.
    doi pubmed pmc
  38. BV SK, Sharma S, Swathi KS, Yamini KR, Kiran CP, Chandrika K. Review on IoT based Healthcare systems. IEEE. 2022.
  39. Mutter D, Vix M, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Leroy J, Marescaux J. WeBSurg: An innovative educational Web site in minimally invasive surgery—principles and results. Surg Innov. 2011;18(1):8-14.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Gastroenterology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Gastroenterology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1918-2805 (print), 1918-2813 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.gastrores.org   editorial contact: editor@gastrores.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.