Gastroenterol Res
Gastroenterology Research, ISSN 1918-2805 print, 1918-2813 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Gastroenterol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.gastrores.org

Review

Volume 4, Number 3, June 2011, pages 93-96


Fidaxomicin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection in the Pediatric Population - Not Quite So Soon Yet

Tanya Danielsa, Tsz-Yin Sob, c

aUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
bDepartment of Pharmacy, Moses H. Cone Hospital, Greensboro, NC 27401, USA
cCorresponding author: Tsz-Yin So, Email:

Manuscript accepted for publication April 28, 2011
Short title: Fidaxomicin Use in Pediatrics - Not So Soon
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/gr318e

Abstract▴Top 

Fidaxomicin is a new narrow spectrum macrocyclic antibiotic. It inhibits bacterial RNA polymerase and eradicates C difficile with minimal effect on normal intestinal flora. The US FDA granted orphan drug designation for all formulations of fidaxomicin for the treatment of C difficile infections in pediatric patients on January 10, 2011. Fidaxomicin has bactericidal activity against C difficile with a prolonged post-antibiotic effect. Even though this medication has an orphan designation for pediatrics, all the available pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were in subjects ≥ 18 years old. The MIC90 for fidaxomicin against C. difficile varies from 0.0078 to 0.25 mcg/ml. Fidaxomicin is poorly absorbed. The highest peak plasma concentration in patients treated with fidaxomicin was 0.191 mcg/ml. Fecal levels of fidaxomicin after oral administration are extremely high. The average fecal concentrations in C difficile patients were 255.6 mcg/g, 441.7 mcg/g, and 1443.3 mcg/g in the 100, 200, and 400 mg/day groups, respectively. At a dose of 400 mg/day the average fecal concentration was 5700 times higher than the highest MIC90 of fidaxomicin against C difficile. In a phase III clinical trial fidaxomicin 200 mg twice daily was compared with vancomycin 125 mg four times per day orally for 10 days. Only two patients were 18 years old, and no patients younger than 18 years old participated in the study. The rates of clinical cure with fidaxomicin were noninferior to those with vancomycin. Patients who were infected with non-North American Pulsed Field type 1 strains had fewer recurrences in the fidaxomicin group than patients in the vancomycin group. Side effects were similar between both therapies. Most patients experienced mild gastro-intestinal symptoms. Fidaxomicin is a good therapeutic alternative to vancomycin and metronidazole, especially in patients with recurrence of C difficile infection. Patients rarely experience systemic side effects which improves compliance. The dose of fidaxomicin is expected to be 200 mg given orally twice a day for patients 16 years and older. At this point, Optimer Pharmaceuticals Inc has conducted clinical trials in adults only. Additional clinical trials in pediatric patients are needed before therapeutic recommendations can be made in this population.

Keywords: Fidaxomicin; Pediatrics; Clostridium difficile; Pharmacokinetic; Pharmacodynamic

Introduction▴Top 

Clostridium difficile is a gram-positive, anaerobic, spore-forming bacillus that is responsible for the development of antibiotic-associated diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis. Occasionally, antibiotic therapy results in a disturbance of normal bacterial flora of the colon. This leads to colonization with C difficile which releases powerful toxins that cause mucosal inflammation and damage [1]. C difficile infection usually manifests as mild-to-moderate diarrhea accompanied by abdominal cramping, but some patients present with acute abdomen and life-threatening fulminant colitis [2]. C difficile colitis is one of the most common nosocomial infections. Approximately 20% of hospitalized patients acquire C difficile during hospitalization [3]. This infection affects more than 700,000 people, including pediatric patients, in the United States (US) yearly [4]. C difficile infections are a well-known cause of diarrhea in children. The number of C difficile cases in children older than 1 year old more than doubled between 1997 and 2006. Pediatric patients with C difficile infection were younger and more likely to be Caucasians and to have private insurance [5]. Most patients recover without specific therapy, but in some cases symptoms can be prolonged and debilitating. Vancomycin or metronidazole along with discontinuation of precipitating antibiotic is currently used to treat C difficile colitis [6]. While initial response to these medications is good, resistant strains of C difficile are emerging, and the rate of recurrence is quite high. Thirty percent of patients experience a recurrence of illness within 60 days [2].

Fidaxomicin (Dificid™) is a first representative of a new class of narrow spectrum macrocyclic antibiotic. Fidaxomicin is developed by Optimer Pharmaceuticals Inc., San Diego, CA. The US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) granted orphan drug designation for all formulations of fidaxomicin for the treatment of C difficile infections in pediatric patients 16 years old and younger on January 10, 2011. The drug is currently under consideration for standard approval by the FDA. Approval is expected to be in May 2011 [7]. In this article we aim to provide a review on the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, dosage and tolerability, clinical effectiveness and clinical application of fidaxomicin in the treatment of C difficile infection; and to evaluate if this medication is appropriate to be used in the pediatric population with the available evidence in the literature. A PubMed search was conducted using four major search terms “fidaxomicin”, “pediatrics”, “pharmacokinetics” and “pharmacodynamics”. When “pediatrics” was used as a search term with “fidaxomicin”, no article was found.

Pharmacodynamic Profile/Mechanism of Action▴Top 

Fidaxomicin acts by inhibiting sigma-dependent transcription of bacterial RNA polymerase and selectively eradicating C difficile with minimal effect on normal intestinal flora. Fidaxomicin has bactericidal activity against C difficile with a prolonged (> 24 hours) post-antibiotic effect. It demonstrates faster killing and longer antibacterial effect after drug removal in comparison with vancomycin. Even though this medication has an orphan designation for pediatrics, all the available pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were in subjects ≥ 18 years old. The value of MIC90 for fidaxomicin against C. difficile varies from 0.0078 to 0.25 mcg/ml depending on the in vitro conditions. The value of the MIC90 increased 2 to 8 fold at more alkaline pH. Spontaneous resistance was rare. There has been no cross-resistance with azithromycin, ampicillin, telithromycin, ciprofloxacin, metronidazole, vancomycin, rifampin, and rifaximin. Fidaxomicin lacks activity (MIC > 16 mcg/ml) against Gram-negative anaerobes and facultative aerobes (i.e., Bacteroides species, enterobacteriaceae, Haemophilus species, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). It demonstrates activity (MIC < 2 mcg/ml) against some Gram-positive anaerobes other than C difficile (i.e., Peptostreptococcus species, Clostridium perfringens, and some lactobacilli) but poor activity (MIC > 4 mcg/ml) against many other Gram-positives organisms, such as Staphylococcus aureus (both methicillin-susceptible and resistant) and Enterococcus faecium (both vancomycin-susceptible and resistant) [8].

Pharmacokinetic Profile▴Top 

Pharmacokinetics of fidaxomicin were investigated in healthy volunteers as well as in patients with C difficile infection who were ≥ 18 years old (49.3 ± 8.6 years). After multiple-dose administration of 100, 200, or 400 mg/day of oral fidaxomicin in both patients with C difficile infection and healthy adults, systemic absorption of fidaxomicin was low and plasma concentrations were mostly undetectable (< 5 mcg/ml). However, the proportion of patients with C difficile who had measurable plasma concentrations of fidaxomicin increased in a dose-dependent manner. The percentage of patients with measurable plasma fidaxomicin concentrations in the 100, 200, and 400 mg/day groups was 14.3, 56.3, and 81.3% respectively. The highest peak plasma concentration was 0.191 mcg/ml [9]. Fecal levels of fidaxomicin after oral administration are extremely high. In a phase II study, the average fecal concentrations in C difficile patients were 255.6 mcg/g, 441.7 mcg/g, and 1443.3 mcg/g in the 100, 200, and 400 mg/day groups, respectively. At a dose of 400 mg/day, the average fecal concentration was approximately 5700 times higher than the highest MIC90 of fidaxomicin against C difficile (0.25 mcg/ml). Fidaxomicin forms fecal metabolite, which is also highly active against C difficile. Urinary levels of fidaxomicin were below the limit of detection in all specimens obtained. Half-life of fidaxomicin is between 0.94 and 2.77 hours. Due to low systemic absorption, no adjustment is necessary for patients with renal and hepatic impairment. No drug interactions were reported [10]. (Table 1)

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Summary of Fidaxomicin’s Pharmacokinetic Data in Adults [9, 10]
 
Dosage/Tolerability▴Top 

In a phase II trial adult patients were taking 50 mg BID, 100 mg BID, or 200 mg BID of oral fidaxomicin. Subjects assigned to the 200 mg BID group experienced the highest rates of clinical cure. Fidaxomicin administered at this dose was very well tolerated. Nine out of forty five subjects (four patients in each of the lower dosage groups and one patient in the 400 mg/day group) reported adverse events. All adverse events (fall, shortness of breath, pain in the extremity, renal colic, bronchitis, pneumonia, urinary tract infection, hypotension, fluid overload, pancreatitis, diarrhea, cardiac failure, angina, cerebro-vascular damage, gastro-intestinal bleeding, and Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia) appeared not to be related to the study medication [11, 12].

Phase III Clinical Trial▴Top 

Phase III prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin with those of vancomycin for the treatment of C difficile infection. Six hundred twenty nine adult patients (mean age 61 years) were enrolled in the US and Canada. Subjects who were older than 16 years old could participate in the study; but at the end of the enrollment, only two patients were 18 years old, and no patients younger than 18 years old participated in the study. All patients had acute symptoms of C difficile infection (more than three unformed bowel movements in the 24-hour period before randomization) and a positive result on a stool toxin test obtained within 48 hours before randomization. Subjects could have received up to four doses of metronidazole or vancomycin in the 24-hour period before randomization. Patients with life-threatening or fulminant C difficile infection, toxic megacolon, previous exposure to fidaxomicin, a history of ulcerative colitis or Crohn’s disease, or more than one occurrence of C difficile infection within 3 months before the start of the study were excluded.

Patients were randomly assigned to receive fidaxomicin 200 mg twice daily or vancomycin 125 mg four times daily orally for 10 days. Patients in the fidaxomicin group received antibiotic every 12 hours with intervening matching doses of placebo. Subjects in the vancomycin group received medication every 6 hours. Both study medications and placebo were encapsulated to look the same. The primary end point was clinical cure, defined as resolution of symptoms and no need for further treatment of C difficile infection as of the second day after the end of the course of therapy. The secondary end points were recurrence of C difficile infection (diarrhea and a positive result on a stool toxin test within 4 weeks after treatment) and global cure (cure with no recurrence).

Five hundred forty eight patients (87.1%) were evaluated for the per-protocol analysis. The rates of clinical cure with fidaxomicin were noninferior to those with vancomycin in both the modified intention-to-treat analysis (88.2% with fidaxomicin and 85.8% with vancomycin) and the per-protocol analysis (92.1% with fidaxomicin and 89.8% with vancomycin). Patients in the fidaxomicin group had fewer recurrences of the infection than patients in the vancomycin group and, as a result, had higher global cure rate. This was true for the intention-to-treat analysis (15.4% with fidaxomicin and 25.3% with vancomycin, P = 0.005) as well as for the per-protocol analysis (13.3% with fidaxomicin and 24% with vancomycin, P = 0.004). The lower rate of recurrence was seen in patients with non-North American Pulsed Field type 1 strains only. The side effect profile was similar between the two therapies. Most patients experienced mild gastro-intestinal symptoms. No subject discontinued the medication as a result of intolerance or allergy. Ninety five point eight percent (95.8%) of patients in the fidaxomicin group and 96.1% of patients in the vancomycin group were compliant with therapy [13]. (Table 2)

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Results of Fidaxomicin Versus Vancomycin for C Difficile Infection [13]
 
Clinical Application▴Top 

Fidaxomicin is a promising new drug for the treatment of C difficile colitis which has many advantages over metronidazole and vancomycin. Because of its narrow antimicrobial spectrum, normal intestinal flora is not affected. Unlike metronidazole, fidaxomicin is poorly absorbed. This allows substantial quantities of the drug to reach the colon. Patients also rarely experience systemic side effects, which can help improve compliance. Substantial reduction in C difficile (non-North American Pulsed field type 1 strains) recurrences in comparison with vancomycin is a major advantage of fidaxomicin. Increased activity of fidaxomicin against non-North American Pulsed field type 1 strains of C difficile can be explained by the differences in the sigma-factors exhibited by different strains. Bactericidal activity of fidaxomicin depends on the presence of certain sigma-factors in the bacteria. Fidaxomicin is a bactericidal antibiotic with prolonged post-antibiotic effect. These qualities provide advantage over vancomycin, which is a bacteriostatic antibiotic without post-antibiotic activity [8].

Fidaxomicin is a good therapeutic alternative to vancomycin and metronidazole, especially in patients who experienced recurrence of C difficile infection. Fidaxomicin can potentially be used as a first line treatment in patients who previously had fecal cultures positive for non-North American Pulsed field type 1 C difficile strains. Even though all these pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are currently only in adults, researchers potentially can use this information to conduct safety clinical trial in pediatric patients in the future. As a matter of fact, Optimer Pharmaceutical Inc. is developing an oral suspension formulation for pediatric patients with C difficile infection as required by the FDA [14].

Conclusion▴Top 

C difficile colitis can present a major problem in children treated with broad spectrum antibiotics. At this point, Optimer Pharmaceuticals Inc. has only conducted clinical trials in adults. The phase III study did not include any pediatric patients and had only 2 patients who were 18 years old. Additional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic clinical trials in pediatric patients are needed before therapeutic recommendations can be made in this population. Metronidazole and oral vancomycin still should be the mainstay of therapy for C difficile infection in pediatric patients at this time.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly related to the content of this article.


References▴Top 
  1. Bartlett JG. Clinical practice. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(5):334-339.
    pubmed doi
  2. Fekety R. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and colitis. American College of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;92(5):739-750.
    pubmed
  3. McFarland LV, Mulligan ME, Kwok RY, Stamm WE. Nosocomial acquisition of Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 1989;320(4):204-210.
    pubmed doi
  4. Al-Eidan FA, McElnay JC, Scott MG, Kearney MP. Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in hospitalised patients. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2000;25(2):101-109.
    pubmed doi
  5. Nylund CM, Goudie A, Garza JM, Fairbrother G, Cohen MB. Clostridium difficile Infection in Hospitalized Children in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(5):451-457.
    pubmed doi
  6. Gouliouris T, Brown NM, Aliyu SH. Prevention and treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Med. 2011;11(1):75-79.
    pubmed
  7. Optimer Pharmaceuticlls, Inc. (2011). Fidaxomicin. Retrieved March 8, 2011 from http://www.optimerpharma.com/pipeline.asp?pipeline=1.
  8. Ackermann G, Loffler B, Adler D, Rodloff AC. In vitro activity of OPT-80 against Clostridium difficile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48(6):2280-2282.
    pubmed doi
  9. Shue YK, Sears PS, Shangle S, Walsh RB, Lee C, Gorbach SL, Okumu F, et al. Safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetic studies of OPT-80 in healthy volunteers following single and multiple oral doses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52(4):1391-1395.
    pubmed doi
  10. Miller M. Fidaxomicin (OPT-80) for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2010;11(9):1569-1578.
    pubmed doi
  11. Gerber M, Ackermann G. OPT-80, a macrocyclic antimicrobial agent for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infections: a review. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008;17(4):547-553.
    pubmed doi
  12. Citron DM, Babakhani F, Goldstein EJ, Nagaro K, Sambol S, Sears P, Shue YK, et al. Typing and susceptibility of bacterial isolates from the fidaxomicin (OPT-80) phase II study for C. difficile infection. Anaerobe. 2009;15(6):234-236.
    pubmed doi
  13. Louie TJ, Miller MA, Mullane KM, Weiss K, Lentnek A, Golan Y, Gorbach S, et al. Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(5):422-431.
    pubmed doi
  14. Optimer Pharmaceuticlls, Inc. (2011). Fidaxomicin. Retrieved April 12, 2011 from http://www.optimerpharma.com/fidaxomicin.


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Gastroenterology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Gastroenterology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1918-2805 (print), 1918-2813 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.gastrores.org   editorial contact: editor@gastrores.org    elmer.editorial@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.