Gastroenterol Res
Gastroenterology Research, ISSN 1918-2805 print, 1918-2813 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Gastroenterol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.gastrores.org

Original Article

Volume 3, Number 4, August 2010, pages 163-166


Quality of Life and Symptomatology Before and After Nissen Fundoplication

John-Patrick Devine Byarsa, c, Kishore Pursnanib, Muntzer Mughalb

aSchool of Medicine, Manchester University, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
bDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, Preston, UK
cCorresponding author: Upper GI secretary c/o Mr Pursnani, Royal Preston Hospital, Sharoe Green Lane, Fulwood, Preston, PR2 9HT, UK

Manuscript accepted for publication July 1, 2010
Short title: Life After Nissen Fundoplication
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/gr216e

Abstract▴Top 

Background: Post surgical quality of life (QOL) plays an important role in the decision making process for patients. This study evaluated the subjective opinion of those that underwent Nissen fundoplication to correct their symptoms of hiatus hernia. This study was to evaluate the quality of life and symptomatology before and after in those patients that underwent Nissen fundoplication over an 8-year period.

Methods: A questionnaire that graded the severity of symptoms and quality of life pre- and post-operatively was sent out to those patients that had undergone Nissen fundoplication.

Results: After the operation the symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation, burping and difficulty lying down were markedly decreased (P < 0.0001). There was however an increased incidence of flatulence associated with the procedure (P < 0.0001). Despite this the quality of life was significantly increased in those that underwent Nissen fundoplication (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Nissen Fundoplication has a positive impact on quality of life and is effective in reducing symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation, burping and difficulty lying down associated with a hiatus hernia. There is however an increase in the incidence of flatulence associated with the procedure. In spite of this, 94% of patients would recommend the procedure to someone else.

Keywords: Quality of life; Fundoplication; Hiatus hernia; Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD)

Introduction▴Top 

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the result of spontaneous and involuntary reflux of the contents of the stomach into the oesophagus as a result of an incompetent lower oesophageal sphincter [1]. One of the most common causes of GERD is a hiatus hernia with an incidence in the general population of 5 per 1000 [2]. The history of hiatal hernia surgery dates back to 1919 where Soresi undertook the first elective surgery. Following this operation, surgery witnessed an evolution from the anatomical repair to physiological restoration with Nissen and Belsey developing their famous operations [3].

Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) was first undertaken in 1990 in order to provide short and medium term control of reflux symptoms similar to results seen in open fundoplication [4]. Since then it has gained international praise as being the technique of choice in the surgical correction of GERD associated with hiatus hernia [5].

This study will evaluate the patients’ subjective opinion in quality of life (QOL) changes and symptomatology pre- and post-operatively using a questionnaire.

Patients and Methods▴Top 

The patients selected for this study all underwent either laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) or open Nissen fundoplication (ONF) in the last 8 years in the Royal Preston Hospital or Chorley and South Ribble Hospital (Lancashire, UK). A questionnaire that assessed the severity of symptoms and quality of life pre- and post-operatively were sent out to all 94 patients. Out of the 55 (58%) that replied, 3 had errors by way of accidently missing a page of questions out and thereby were discounted.

The questionnaire was split into 2 sections, the first referring to the pre-operative symptoms and quality of life and the second section referring to the post-operative symptoms and quality of life. The Visick score was used to assess the degree of heartburn. There were specific questions that evaluated symptoms such as dysphagia, regurgitation, burping, bloatedness, flatulence and difficulty lying down. A question that evaluated the quality of life was also included and lastly a question that assessed as to whether or not the patient would recommend the surgery to someone else. The Visick score was on a scale of 1 to 4 (1 = no heartburn and 4 = severe symptoms requiring medication). The rest of the questions relating to symptomatology were on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = not having the symptoms at all and 5 = experiencing the symptoms every day). The quality of life question was also on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = not affected at all and 5 = extremely affected). The last question asked whether or not they would recommend the surgery and was on a yes, no or impartial basis.

Results▴Top 

Out of the 52 patients finally included in the final analysis 29 were male and 23 were female. The ages ranged from 27 to 82 with a mean age of 57.

The shortest duration from surgery when the questionnaire was taken was 3 months and the longest was 96 months with a mean of 43 months from surgery.

Forty-nine of the surgical procedures were laparoscopic, 3 were converted to open from laparoscopic and 1 procedure was an open Nissen fundoplication. One procedure had to be surgically corrected at a later date due to post-operative complications.

The results showed that there was a significant decrease post-operatively in the symptoms of heartburn with a mean difference of 2.057 ± 0.361 (SD) (P < 0.0001). Regurgitation, burping/belching and difficulty lying down were also significantly decreased post-operatively (with mean differences of 1.679 ± 0.515 (SD) (P < 0.0001); 1.208 ± 0.528 (SD) (P < 0.0001); 2.358 ± 0.436 (SD) (P < 0.0001) respectively). There was non-significant differences associated with dysphagia and bloatedness (P = 0.163 and 0.1229 respectively). There was however an increase in flatulence experience by the patients post-surgically with a mean difference of 0.868 ± 0.449 (SD) (P < 0.0001). Nevertheless despite this increase in flatulence there was a substantial subjective improvement in quality of life post-operatively with a mean difference of 2.849 ± 0.399 (SD) (P < 0.0001) (Table 1, Fig. 1 and 2). This increase in quality of life was compounded by 49 (94%) of the patients reporting that they would recommend the surgery to someone else. 2 patients said that they would not recommend the surgery and 1 was impartial.

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Comparison of symptomatology pre- and post-operatively.

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Mean QOL differences (1 = not affected at all and 5 = extremely affected).

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Post-operative Changes in Symptoms and Quality of Life for 52 Patients
 
Discussion▴Top 

Several studies have measured the quality of life following Nissen fundoplication by way of quantifying the success of the procedure [6-8]. Such studies have showed similar significant results with regards to improved QOL. This study has demonstrated that Nissen fundoplication is an effective procedure for the correction of a hiatus hernia. There was substantial reduction in the symptoms of heartburn, regurgitation, burping and difficulty lying down. Symptoms such as dysphagia and bloatedness were not significantly affected and there was an increase in flatulence in patients post-operatively. Despite this there was a significant increase in the quality of life following the procedure.

Retrospective evaluation has its limitations with regards to differing times from the surgery and this could have been improved by a longitudinal study. The study size could also have been increased to include all Nissen fundoplications done within the Trust.

In conclusion, there is a notable decrease in QOL associated with hiatus hernia and as such the increased QOL associated with Nissen fundoplication should play a significant part when informing patients about the procedure.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the help of Susan Trundle who kindly provided assistance with the questionnaires.


References▴Top 
  1. Chen D, Barber C, McLoughlin P, Thavaneswaran P, Jamieson GG, Maddern GJ. Systematic review of endoscopic treatments for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Br J Surg. 2009;96(2):128-136.
    pubmed doi
  2. Luketich JD, Raja S, Fernando HC, Campbell W, Christie NA, Buenaventura PO, Weigel TL, et al. Laparoscopic repair of giant paraesophageal hernia: 100 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):608-618.
    pubmed doi
  3. Stylopoulos N, Rattner DW. The history of hiatal hernia surgery: from Bowditch to laparoscopy. Ann Surg. 2005;241(1):185-193.
    pubmed
  4. Mahon D, Rhodes M, Decadt B, Hindmarsh A, Lowndes R, Beckingham I, Koo B, et al. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication compared with proton-pump inhibitors for treatment of chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux. Br J Surg. 2005;92(6):695-699.
    pubmed doi
  5. Booth MI, Jones L, Stratford J, Dehn TC. Results of laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication at 2-8 years after surgery. Br J Surg. 2002;89(4):476-481.
    pubmed doi
  6. Slim K, Bousquet J, Kwiatkowski F, Lescure G, Pezet D, Chipponi J. Quality of life before and after laparoscopic fundoplication. Am J Surg. 2000;180(1):41-45.
    pubmed doi
  7. Kamolz T, Bammer T, Wykypiel H Jr, Pasiut M, Pointner R. Quality of life and surgical outcome after laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplication: one-year follow-up. Endoscopy. 2000;32(5):363-368.
    pubmed doi
  8. Glise H, Hallerback B, Johansson B. Quality-of-life assessments in evaluation of laparoscopic Rosetti fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 1995;9(2):183-188, discussion 188-189.
    pubmed doi


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Gastroenterology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Gastroenterology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1918-2805 (print), 1918-2813 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.gastrores.org   editorial contact: editor@gastrores.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.