Gastroenterol Res
Gastroenterology Research, ISSN 1918-2805 print, 1918-2813 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Gastroenterol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.gastrores.org

Editorial

Volume 11, Number 4, August 2018, pages 261-263


The Role of the Gut Barrier Function in Health and Disease

Stelios F. Assimakopoulosa, d, Christos Triantosb, Ioannis Maroulisc, Charalambos Gogosa

aDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Patras Medical School, Patras 26504, Greece
bDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Patras Medical School, Patras 26504, Greece
cDepartment of Surgery, University of Patras Medical School, Patras 26504, Greece
dCorrespondence Author: Stelios F. Assimakopoulos, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Patras Medical School, Patras 26504, Greece

Manuscript submitted May 31, 2018, accepted June 7, 2018
Short title: Editorial
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/gr1053w

The intestinal tract contains the body’s largest interface between a person and his or her external environment. The complexity of its function is obvious when thinking that at the same time the intestine must serve two opposite functions; the selective permeability of needed nutrients from the intestinal lumen into the circulation and into the internal milieu in general and, on the other hand, the prevention of the penetration of harmful entities including microorganisms, luminal antigens, and luminal proinflammatory factors. The latter function is known as barrier function [1].

The gut barrier function is comprised by three major lines of defence [2]: 1) The biological barrier, which is made up of normal intestinal flora (gut microbiota) responsible for colonization resistance; 2) The immune barrier, which is composed of gut associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), effector and regulatory T cells, IgA producing B (plasma) cells, group 3 innate lymphoid cells, and, resident macrophages and dendritic cells in the lamina propria; and 3) The mechanical barrier, consisting of the closed-lining intestinal epithelial cells and by the capillary endothelial cells. The epithelial and endothelial cells come into the closest possible contact in the most apical part of the lateral cell membranes (“kissing points”) by specific structures named “tight junctions” (TJs), which interconnect the cells and restrict the passage of ions, molecules and cells through the paracellular space [2, 3].

The term “bacterial translocation” (BT), was first described by Berg and Garlington in 1979, as the phenomenon of passage of viable bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract through the epithelial mucosa into the lamina propria and then to the mesenteric lymph nodes and possibly other normally sterile organs [4]. This initial definition was later widened to include the translocation of non-viable bacteria or their products, namely pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs), with main representative the intestinal endotoxin. BT occurs in healthy individuals in a low rate of 5-10%, serving two main physiological roles; the antigenic exposure of the gut immune system to be prepared for an effective immune response in case of extensive pathogen invasion, and the development of immune tolerance to several microbial antigens of commensal microflora [5-7].

The intestinal barrier is compromised in several disease states leading to an increased level of BT associated with infectious complications and promotion of a systemic inflammatory response that aggravates the pathophysiological consequences of the underlying disease [8-13]. There are three main pathophysiological groups of intestinal barrier failure associated with pathologic conditions:

1) The intestinal barrier failure observed in surgical patients subjected to major operations for diverse reasons (major liver resections, bowel resections for malignancy, bowel transplantation, aortic aneurysm repair). In this group of patients, increased BT is associated with increased postoperative infectious complications [5, 11, 14-17]. The connecting mechanism is translocation of gut-derived pathogens through a dysfunctional mucosal barrier to the mesenteric lymph nodes, the portal vein and the systemic circulation, eventually leading to postoperative infections [18]. Also, this is the mechanism by which the necrotic pancreas becomes infected in patients with severe necrotic pancreatitis [19].

2) The second group includes critically ill patients, severely injured or septic, hospitalized in intensive care units. Increased gut permeability is associated with the development of systemic inflammatory response and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) in these patients. However, the connecting pathophysiological link of gut barrier failure and MODS does not seem to be the classical process of BT [18]. Current pathogenetic aspects support the “gut-lymph” theory of sepsis and MODS. According to this theory, microbes and/or their products, through a dysfunctional gut barrier, first gain access to the intestinal submucosa activating the intestinal immunological system of defence. An intestinal proinflammatory response further aggravates intestinal injury and danger-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are released in the mesenteric lymphatics, carried to the lung and the systemic circulation, stimulating Toll like receptors-4 and perhaps other pattern recognition receptors (PRR) in a fashion similar to bacteria, thus eventually promoting injurious effects in diverse organs [20]. Therefore, the gut becomes a pivotal proinflammatory organ promoting deleterious effects in even distant organs, through release of DAMPs, without the need of systemic bacterial translocation [18, 20].

3) The third group of intestinal barrier dysfunction involves stable patients with chronic pathologic conditions that present a low-grade translocation of enteric microbes and immunostimulatory bioproducts from the gut lumen first in the lamina propria and thereafter in the systemic circulation, promoting a chronic immune activation associated with disease progression and/or development of complications and comorbidities from other organs [1, 21, 22]. This intestinal barrier dysfunction group encompasses patients with HIV infection, liver cirrhosis, chronic viral hepatitis Β or C, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, celiac disease, irritable bowel syndrome, obesity and diverse autoimmune conditions [1, 21-23]. For example, in HIV infection, intestinal barrier dysfunction, BT and chronic immune activation have been associated with cardiovascular, neurocognitive and lymphoproliferative comorbidities, despite effective viral suppression with modern antiretroviral treatment; and in liver cirrhosis intestinal barrier dysfunction has been associated with all of its complications, namely spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome, variceal bleeding, progression of liver injury and hepatocellular carcinoma [21, 22].

In conclusion, the Hippocratic quote “all disease begins in the gut” seems to be true, over 2,000 years later, for diverse pathological conditions. Our knowledge on the pivotal role of the intestinal barrier and gut microbiota in health and disease has been majorly developed and constitutes currently a scientific field of intense research. Clinicians should not neglect considering this central pathophysiological role of the gut and should apply all necessary preventive measures to protect the integrity of their patients’ intestines in diverse intestinal and extra-intestinal diseases. Future research with application of modern systems biology approaches, namely using genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics might lead to specific and potentially individualized pharmacological targets for intervention to control intestinal hyperpermeability.

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest to report that may be related to this submission.

Author Contributions

All authors contributed equally.

Funding

No funding by any private or public party was received for this Editorial.

Abbreviations

TJ: tight junctions; BT: bacterial translocation; PAMPS: pathogen-associated molecular patterns; DAMPs: danger-associated molecular patterns; PRR: pattern recognition receptors; MODS: multiple organ dysfunction syndrome


References▴Top 
  1. Konig J, Wells J, Cani PD, Garcia-Rodenas CL, MacDonald T, Mercenier A, Whyte J, et al. Human intestinal barrier function in health and disease. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2016;7(10):e196.
    doi pubmed
  2. Assimakopoulos SF, Scopa CD, Vagianos CE. Pathophysiology of increased intestinal permeability in obstructive jaundice. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(48):6458-6464.
    doi pubmed
  3. Assimakopoulos SF, Papageorgiou I, Charonis A. Enterocytes' tight junctions: From molecules to diseases. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2011;2(6):123-137.
    doi pubmed
  4. Berg RD, Garlington AW. Translocation of certain indigenous bacteria from the gastrointestinal tract to the mesenteric lymph nodes and other organs in a gnotobiotic mouse model. Infect Immun. 1979;23(2):403-411.
    pubmed
  5. Sedman PC, Macfie J, Sagar P, Mitchell CJ, May J, Mancey-Jones B, Johnstone D. The prevalence of gut translocation in humans. Gastroenterology. 1994;107(3):643-649.
    doi
  6. Vaishnavi C. Translocation of gut flora and its role in sepsis. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2013;31(4):334-342.
    doi pubmed
  7. Wiest R, Lawson M, Geuking M. Pathological bacterial translocation in liver cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2014;60(1):197-209.
    doi pubmed
  8. Wiest R, Rath HC. Gastrointestinal disorders of the critically ill. Bacterial translocation in the gut. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003;17(3):397-425.
    doi
  9. Ambrose NS, Johnson M, Burdon DW, Keighley MR. Incidence of pathogenic bacteria from mesenteric lymph nodes and ileal serosa during Crohn's disease surgery. Br J Surg. 1984;71(8):623-625.
    doi pubmed
  10. Deitch EA. Simple intestinal obstruction causes bacterial translocation in man. Arch Surg. 1989;124(6):699-701.
    doi pubmed
  11. Woodcock NP, Sudheer V, El-Barghouti N, Perry EP, MacFie J. Bacterial translocation in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg. 2000;87(4):439-442.
    doi pubmed
  12. Assimakopoulos SF, Thomopoulos KC, Patsoukis N, Georgiou CD, Scopa CD, Nikolopoulou VN, Vagianos CE. Evidence for intestinal oxidative stress in patients with obstructive jaundice. Eur J Clin Invest. 2006;36(3):181-187.
    doi pubmed
  13. Assimakopoulos SF, Tsamandas AC, Tsiaoussis GI, Karatza E, Triantos C, Vagianos CE, Spiliopoulou I, et al. Altered intestinal tight junctions' expression in patients with liver cirrhosis: a pathogenetic mechanism of intestinal hyperpermeability. Eur J Clin Invest. 2012;42(4):439-446.
    doi pubmed
  14. O'Boyle CJ, MacFie J, Mitchell CJ, Johnstone D, Sagar PM, Sedman PC. Microbiology of bacterial translocation in humans. Gut. 1998;42(1):29-35.
    doi pubmed
  15. MacFie J, O'Boyle C, Mitchell CJ, Buckley PM, Johnstone D, Sudworth P. Gut origin of sepsis: a prospective study investigating associations between bacterial translocation, gastric microflora, and septic morbidity. Gut. 1999;45(2):223-228.
    doi pubmed
  16. Chin KF, Kallam R, O'Boyle C, MacFie J. Bacterial translocation may influence the long-term survival in colorectal cancer patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007;50(3):323-330.
    doi pubmed
  17. MacFie J, Reddy BS, Gatt M, Jain PK, Sowdi R, Mitchell CJ. Bacterial translocation studied in 927 patients over 13 years. Br J Surg. 2006;93(1):87-93.
    doi pubmed
  18. Deitch EA. Gut-origin sepsis: evolution of a concept. Surgeon. 2012;10(6):350-356.
    doi pubmed
  19. Isaji S, Mizuno S, Tabata M, Yamagiwa K, Yokoi H, Uemoto S. Bacterial analysis of infected pancreatic necrosis and its prevention (Symposium 8: Pancreatobiliary infection (IHPBA)). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2003;10(6):419-424.
    doi pubmed
  20. Deitch EA. Gut lymph and lymphatics: a source of factors leading to organ injury and dysfunction. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1207 Suppl 1(E103-111.
  21. Tsiaoussis GI, Assimakopoulos SF, Tsamandas AC, Triantos CK, Thomopoulos KC. Intestinal barrier dysfunction in cirrhosis: Current concepts in pathophysiology and clinical implications. World J Hepatol. 2015;7(17):2058-2068.
    doi pubmed
  22. Assimakopoulos SF, Dimitropoulou D, Marangos M, Gogos CA. Intestinal barrier dysfunction in HIV infection: pathophysiology, clinical implications and potential therapies. Infection. 2014;42(6):951-959.
    doi pubmed
  23. Assimakopoulos SF, Charonis AS. Uncovering the molecular events associated with increased intestinal permeability in liver cirrhosis: the pivotal role of enterocyte tight junctions and future perspectives. J Hepatol. 2013;59(5):1144-1146.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Gastroenterology Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Gastroenterology Research, bimonthly, ISSN 1918-2805 (print), 1918-2813 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.

This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.gastrores.org   editorial contact: editor@gastrores.org    elmer.editorial@hotmail.com
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.