Gastroenterology Research, ISSN 1918-2805 print, 1918-2813 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, Gastroenterol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.gastrores.org

Original Article

Volume 13, Number 2, April 2020, pages 73-80


Benefits of the Therapy With Abexol in Patients With Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Effects on secondary efficacy outcomes. aP < 0.05 comparison with baseline (t-test for paired samples); bP < 0.05 comparison with placebo (t-test for independent samples).
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Effects on laboratory variables. All comparisons were not significant. ALT: alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; GGT: gamma glutamyl transferase.

Tables

Table 1. Baseline Characteristics of Study Patients
 
Abexol (n = 50)Placebo (n = 50)Total (n = 100)
All comparisons were not significant. The table included CM consumed by ≥ two patients. BMI: body mass index; CM: concomitant medications; X: mean; SD: standard deviation; ACEI: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor.
Age (years) (X ± SD)53 ± 953 ± 853 ± 9
BMI (kg/m2) (X ± SD)29.7 ± 5.329.1 ± 4.129.4 ± 4.6
n, %n, %n, %
Gender, n (%)
  Female28 (56.0%)26 (52.0%)54 (54.0%)
  Male22 (44.0%)24 (48.0%)46 (46.0%)
Personal history, n (%)
  Hypertension30 (60.0%)27 (54.0%)57 (57.0%)
  Dyslipidemia27 (54.0%)26 (52.0%)53 (53.0 %)
  Overweight (BMI ≥ 25, < 30 kg/m2)23 (46.0%)24 (48.0%)47 (47.0 %)
  Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2)20 (40.0%)19 (38.0%)39 (39.0%)
  Diabetes mellitus12 (24.0%)10 (20.0%)22 (22.0%)
  Smoking11 (22.0%)9 (18.0%)20 (20.0%)
  Coronary heart disease4 (8.0%)5 (10%)9 (9.0%)
CM, n (%)
  Patients consuming CM48 (96.0%)47 (94%)95 (95.0%)
  ACEI20 (40.0%)16 (32.0%)36 (36.0%)
  Lipid-lowering drugs15 (30.0%)16 (32.0%)31 (31.0%)
  Diuretics14 (28.0%)14 (28.0%)28 (28.0%)
  Oral hypoglycemic drugs12 (24.0%)10 (20.0%)22 (22.0%)
  β-blockers6 (12.0%)4 (8.0%)10 (10.0%)
  Antiplatelet drugs4 (8.0%)5 (10.0%)9 (9.0%)
  Calcium antagonists2 (4.0%)4 (8.0%)6 (6.0%)
  Nitrovasodilator2 (4.0%)2 (4.0%)4 (4.0%)

 

Table 2. Effects on Ultrasonographic Evaluation
 
Degree of severityAbexolPlaceboP value
P < 0.05 comparison with placebo (χ2 test). ns: no significant.
Baseline
  Normal00ns
  Mild1718ns
  Moderate2324ns
  Severe108ns
Six months
  Normal146P < 0.05
  Mild1618ns
  Moderate1721ns
  Severe35ns

 

Table 3. Effects on Secondary Efficacy Outcomes (X ± SD)
 
TreatmentBaselineSix monthsChanges (%)
aP < 0.05 comparison with baseline (t-test for paired samples); bP < 0.05 comparison with placebo (t-test for independent samples). X: mean; SD: standard deviation.
Insulin levels (µUI/mL)
  Placebo70.6 ± 29.873.2 ± 30.1+3.7
  Abexol71.4 ± 28.650.6 ± 31.2a, b-29.1
HOMA index
  Placebo11.5 ± 5.513.3 ± 8.6+15.7
  Abexol12.2 ± 8.29.0 ± 5.1a, b-26.3

 

Table 4. Effects on Laboratory Variables (X ± SD)
 
TreatmentBaselineThree monthsSix months
All comparisons were not significant. X: mean: SD standard deviation; ALT alanine aminotransferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase; GGT: gamma glutamyl transferase.
AST (U/L)
  Placebo28.1 ± 10.228.9 ± 10.527.3 ± 11.1
  Abexol28.4 ± 11.327.3 ± 10.826.2 ± 10.7
ALT (U/L)
  Placebo32.6 ± 13.430.9 ± 12.531.4 ± 14.7
  Abexol31.9 ± 14.330.1 ± 11.929.6 ± 13.5
GGT (U/L)
  Placebo41.2 ± 28.639.9 ± 25.840.1 ± 26.7
  Abexol42.1 ± 26.540.3 ± 23.738.9 ± 24.5
Glucose (mmol/L)
  Placebo5.4 ± 1.65.5 ± 1.05.0 ± 1.7
  Abexol5.7 ± 1.45.5 ± 1.25.2 ± 1.1
Creatinine (μmol/L)
  Placebo75.9 ± 13.476.8 ± 14.275.3 ± 15.1
  Abexol80.6 ± 18.679.1 ± 14.478.6 ± 14.7